Everything is waiting on you.Some of it doesn’t have to be.

Magnifio is an AI chief of staff for engineers. It reads your tickets, code and email, sets you up for your meetings, and takes care of the tedious work — so what’s left is the part that actually needs you.

Get started Talk to us about a pilot

Free to start. No card, no sales call.

MThis morningTue 08:00example morning

9 on you4 already done

Done — needs your yes

4 items

Filed the auth timeout Priya raised in standup
linear.issue.create · ENT-902, assigned to her
Whysaid “someone should file that”
Opened a PR for the refund window your policy changed in May
github.draft_pr.reference · billing-api #2181 · draft
Why4 files · tests passedreviewed itself once
Answered the open question on ENT-812 — it’s in the RFC
linear.issue.add_comment · drafted, not posted
Whyblocking 1 person since Thu
Held 90 minutes tomorrow before the design review
calendar.focus_block.create · private and reversible
you allowed this one · 1 of 3 today
ran without asking

Still needs you

5 items

Approve the Postgres migration plan — two people are blocked
decision · waiting since Friday
your call
3 pull requests waiting on your review, oldest is 4 days
commitment · you are the only approver
your eyes
Staging has been red since Friday and nobody owns it
risk · 4 days, no assignee
nobody owns it
Naveen’s 1:1 is at 2pm — you said you’d have an answer on the promo
commitment · promised 19 Aug
only you
Vendor hasn’t come back on the SSO quote
waiting_for · 11 days, chased twice
not yours to fix

nothing above has happened yet

Reads, with your permissions, checked per document

Linear
Jira
GitHub
Confluence
Calendar
Gmail
Drive

Each one authorized on its own, and revocable on its own.

Three things, and it does all three.

Most assistants give you a better list. Magnifio gives you a shorter one, because it has already done part of it.

Knows what’s on you

Commitments you made, decisions people are blocked on, things you’re owed, risks nobody has picked up — worked out from what your team already writes down.

commitment: You said you would, and it is still open
decision: People are waiting on your answer
waiting_for: You are owed something, and it has been a while
risk: Nobody has picked it up

extracted this week6 sources

Staging red since Fridayfrom #platform, 4 days
risk
Answer Naveen on the promosaid so on 19 Aug
commitment
SSO quote from the vendorchased twice, 11 days
waiting_for
Postgres migration plan2 people blocked
decision

Clears what it can

Files the issue, answers the question, corrects the doc, holds the time, opens the pull request. Everything it proposes arrives finished, not as a reminder.

files: The issue nobody wrote down, assigned to the person who raised it
drafts: The comment, the doc correction, the pull request — written, not suggested
holds: The time you needed before the review, on your calendar
cites: Every one of them carries the sentence that caused it

proposedeach one finished

linear.issue.createENT-902 · assigned to Priya
drafted
github.draft_prbilling-api #2181 · 4 files
drafted
confluence.page.amendRFC 014 §3 · 1 line
drafted
calendar.focus_block90 min · private, reversible
ran

Never acts unapproved

Anything anyone outside your account can see waits for a person, every time. There is no setting that changes that, and no prompt that reaches past it.

private: Reversible, and only if you allowed that kind — capped daily
external: Always you, with no exception and no override
brokered: The agent holds no keys of its own

approval policyset in code

Hold time on your calendarnobody else sees it
may run
Comment on a ticketyour team sees it
needs you
Open a pull requestyour repo sees it
needs you
Send an emailsomeone outside sees it
needs you

It’s the only one of these that can open the pull request.

When the fix is code, it doesn’t hand the ticket back to you. It gets its own throwaway machine, reads the systems that explain why the code is the way it is, and comes back with a draft.

01
Reads Confluence, Linear and Jira alongside the repo — the reasons aren’t in your working tree
02
Writes a pass, then reviews itself in a second, independent one
03
Stops and asks when the ticket and a document disagree
04
If CI goes red, it fixes it and updates the same review
05
Opens a draft. It has no capability to merge one

workspaceENT-844

draft ready

grep — 3 call sites in the repo
index — 2 reasons outside it
  confluence Northwind MSA §7.3 14 days, contractual
  github     PR #1902           reverted 6 Mar, same change

? enterprise accounts are contractually fixed.
  exclude them, or is the MSA being renegotiated?

— you: exclude them

✓ 4 files, carve-out + test
✓ reviewed, 3 findings fixed
✓ draft PR #2181 · checks green

It holds less than you think.

Written for the person who will ask before your team can try it. Every line below is a mechanism, not a promise.

scoped from day one: A GitHub App you install, limited to the repositories and branches you approve, revocable in one click. Each source authorized separately.
permissions per document: Checked as the question is asked, not at index time. If you can’t open the page, it is never quoted to you. Signing in requests only openid email profile.
the agent holds no keys: Coding runs on a throwaway machine with no GitHub token, no cloud credential and no provider key. It must prove it cannot reach instance credentials before it is allowed to start.
it never grades itself: The patch is reconstructed and validated in a disposable checkout outside that machine. Nothing the machine produced is trusted, including its own diff.
bounded, not promised: One repair pass, two CI remediations, a daily ceiling on unattended actions. Limits in the code, not instructions to a model.

Two people have to say yes.

You are the bottleneck on six things, and it is 08:00

Connect your tracker and a scoped GitHub App. The first brief arrives the next morning, and part of it is already done.

Get started

Free to start.

You have to defend it before you can try it

Start with the two sources that clear a security review without a meeting. We’ll walk your reviewer through the boundary, the grant model and the ceilings.

Start with two sources

No card, no sales call.

Shreeven KommireddyCo-founder
Kaushal BharadwajCo-founder

We build this for the mornings we were having. You can talk to either of us directly.